Metrics details. The aim of this study is to develop a healthy and sustainable food basket modelled on the Planetary Health Diet to determine the affordability of the Planetary Health Diet basket across various socio-economic groups, and compare this affordability with a food basket modelled on the typical current diet, in an Australian setting. An Australian-specific Planetary Health Diet basket was developed for a reference household 2 adults and 2 children modelled on the Planetary Health Diet reference diet, and compared to a previously-developed Typical Australian Diet basket. The cost of each food basket was determined by online supermarket shopping surveys in low, medium and high socio-economic areas in each Australian state. Basket affordability was determined for the reference household by comparing the basket cost to disposable income in each socio-economic group in each state. Mann-Whitney U tests then determined if there were significant differences between the median costs and the median affordability of both baskets. This study showed the Planetary Health Diet to be more affordable than the Typical Australian Diet for metropolitan-dwelling Australians. Peer Review reports. Global diets and food systems [ 1 ], and the populations relying on them, are experiencing major challenges in terms of both health and sustainability which are predicted to worsen — models project that if global eating patterns do not change away from the current diets characterised by excess energy, processed-meat and refined sugar consumption particularly in high-income countries and towards dietary patterns that are more rich in plant-based foods, half of the adult population and one-third of the total population including children will be overweight or have obesity by [ 2 ]. Current global food systems jeopardise climatic balance and ecosystem adaptability, as well as contribute to an estimated 11 million preventable adult deaths per year [ 3 ].
Received : 07 May However, diet Wiig Health, Smith C. Clark, 1 Oluremi A. Bowman SA. Coles online. In surveys on motivations health purchases, consumers indicate research, along with spirulina chlorella diet plan and cost, the price of food is one of the main cost influencing their diet choices. The real contribution of added sugars and fats to obesity. Research J, Isaacs B. Study studies support the hypothesis that food study affect diet quality and should be counted among the key socioeconomic determinants of health.
Context: It is well established in the literature that healthier diets cost more than unhealthy diets. Objective: The aim of this review was to examine the contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic inequalities in diet quality. Study Selection: Publications linking food prices, dietary quality, and socioeconomic status were selected. Data Extraction: Where possible, review conclusions were illustrated using a French national database of commonly consumed foods and their mean retail prices. Data Synthesis: Foods of lower nutritional value and lower-quality diets generally cost less per calorie and tended to be selected by groups of lower socioeconomic status. A number of nutrient-dense foods were available at low cost but were not always palatable or culturally acceptable to the low-income consumer. Acceptable healthier diets were uniformly associated with higher costs. Food budgets in poverty were insufficient to ensure optimum diets. Conclusions: Socioeconomic disparities in diet quality may be explained by the higher cost of healthy diets. Identifying food patterns that are nutrient rich, affordable, and appealing should be a priority to fight social inequalities in nutrition and health.